
Well folks, this doesn't technically fall under the stipulations set forth as the basis of the Trash NYC blog. However, wanted to share with you the latest springtime shenanegins going on in the Big Apple.
It seems some hot-shot @ BBDO handling the GE Healthcare account must've surely been promoted for coming up with the logistics on this campaign!
On the face, it all seems rather innocent. Who, after all, would argue the merits of a healthy lifestyle? Certainly not I, nor Kara Paine (photographed subject shown here)! In fact, it was for Kara - a struggling NYC actress; performer; producer & writer - that I agreed to allowing the folks who dreamed up this scheme to use my photo as a part of the latest GE campaign. What aspiring actor doesn't dream of saying, "Look Ma, my image is in Times Square!"?
And this is precisely the basis on which BBDO account executives' pitched to the hundreds (possibly thousands) of photographers on flickr.com.
"Have your photo seen in Times Square as part of GE's healthy lifestyle campaign. Tell all of your friends' & family!... andplease just click this button allowing us to broadcast your image for free - thanks".
For those of you unfamiliar with flickr , it is a photo site where thousands of people interested in photography - from the novice hobby-ites, to the seasoned professionals - post their photographs. It is a wonderful place to share, to discuss & to receive feedback on photography. And, it seems, a "Getty Images" cachet for advertising folks - except, of course, at no cost.
Let me state that the photo gathering done by AE's was strictly on the up-and-up. They created an account on the site (specifically for the purposes of this campaign), sifted through thousands of images befitting of their theme and sent e-mails out to flickr users expressing interest in using the particular passing photo(s). If the party wanted his/her photo to be considered, then said photographer was instructed to go to the website included in the e-mail & to upload a photo. In doing so, they also agreed to relenquish all rights to any photo chosen for the campaign.
My opinion, as a person with an advertising; marketing and PR background, is that this is an absolutely brilliant way to cut costs in a very BIG way. Kudos to you! From the standpoint of a multi-media artist & also a creative, I find it a little disconcerting (read: sickening). With the thousands of professional photographers; agents & stock houses available, why would anyone need to troll flickr for free images? I can only think of one reason and it isn't pretty.
Something about this stinks of the "Whose Who" concept still alive & well today. When I was a kid, Whose Who sent mailings to all of the kids in my high school to see if they could cull some cash from youngsters hoping for another honor to add to their college applications. The Whose Who concept is also a very clever one. They offer a free listing for the "chosen" Whose Who amongst U.S. high school graduates-to-be. The kicker comes when each teen opting for a free listing, is then later solicited to buy the listings book - then, I think for $75. I never bought the book, nor opted for a listing, but know hundreds of people who did. I think Whose Who has grown to include "Whose Who Women in Business" and many more outlets. The two resonate as similiar because they both ring as a skeezy way to make, or to save money - by using people.
This said, I willingly included my image for consideration, because I really couldn't believe what they were up to & wanted to see where it was going. And now we all know where it went - TIMES SQUARE! And there was Kara to think of, of course. Just wanted you photographers out there "in the loop" re: Madison Avenue Ad execs. latest shady tactics.
Happy snapping, but please use protection!




